NSGP Online Championship 10

[przemator]

Want to clarify something, what if we get, for example, two Brazillian races? They will both be included right? Just one under a different name.

The 20 tracks with the most votes should be included regardless of the country they are in!

We can't put 5 races from UK if they get in top 20 (Wales GP, Scotland GP, Cheshire GP?). I don't want to make up silly names for GPs. I think it's not to date with contemporary standards.

The voters should be aware that some tracks have no backup GP and that there will only be 1 Europe GP and Pacific GP.

Regarding the Brazilian tracks, I guess we could count one of them as Pacific GP. Hopefully the other Brazliian track won't get qualified, it's very long and you never brake...

[peter-27]

We can't put 5 races from UK if they get in top 20 (Wales GP, Scotland GP, Cheshire GP?). I don't want to make up silly names for GPs. I think it's not to date with contemporary standards.

Why not exactly? If they get the most votes people want them so they should be the races - isn't that the point in the vote?

Names of races don't matter really lol! True it wouldn't upto date with contemporary standards - but we are NSGPOC not F1.

It's unfair if we allow if for Europe and Pacific and not others.

[przemator]

Look at it this way: It's fair because everybody knows up straight that there can only be one Europe GP and 1 Pacific GP and they can apply it in their voting. IMO no country should have more than 2 races in a season, no matter how cool tracks this country has. We are NSGPOC, but we stay true to F1.

With Brazil being included in Pacific GP battle, all multi-track countries have a backup GP provided.

[peter-27]

Look at it this way: It's fair because everybody knows up straight that there can only be one Europe GP and 1 Pacific GP and they can apply it in their voting. IMO no country should have more than 2 races in a season, no matter how cool tracks this country has. We are NSGPOC, but we stay true to F1.

With Brazil being included in Pacific GP battle, all multi-track countries have a backup GP provided.

I see your point but the whole concept doesn't make sense this way.

We vote to see which tracks are most wanted. The 20 tracks who have the highest number of votes are the most popular - fact. Yet a less popular track finishing 21st may be used? Doesn't make any sense. The president needs to decide on this!

[przemator]

Well, it makes sense if you keep in mind that besides the top20 vote, each track takes part in a vote to represent it's country, and every voter is aware of that fact and votes accordingly.

[berni19]

Is it possible still to have some seat - any care will do for me except ferrari...

[przemator]

Is it possible still to have some seat - any care will do for me except ferrari...

Bernie, today was last race of season 9. First race of season 10 will be in 2 weeks (May 26). There will be plenty of free seats. Why did you leave before the race today? Before each race there is a restart to set the correct number of laps, you did not come after restart.

[peter-27]

Well, it makes sense if you keep in mind that besides the top20 vote, each track takes part in a vote to represent it's country, and every voter is aware of that fact and votes accordingly.

"each track takes part in a vote to represent it's country" - except Japan and Europe which gets two - unfair!

President needs to make a decision here.

[peter-27]

Vote weighting has been updated

[przemator]

"each track takes part in a vote to represent it's country" - except Japan and Europe which gets two - unfair!

President needs to make a decision here.

Peter, what are you talking about? Every country can be represented by one track. Moreover, 2 tracks may (or may not) be selected from the most popular "second choices".

This does NOT mean that e.g. Indian track has lesser chance to get selected. Each track that gets to top20 and has most votes in it's country (in case of India there is no competition) is guaranteed to be selected.

[peter-27]

Peter, what are you talking about? Every country can be represented by one track. Moreover, 2 tracks may (or may not) be selected from the most popular "second choices".

This does NOT mean that e.g. Indian track has lesser chance to get selected. Each track that gets to top20 and has most votes in it's country (in case of India there is no competition) is guaranteed to be selected.

And if Suzuka and Fuji both inside the top 20?

Let's see what the president says, i think it should simply be the top twenty tracks in terms of votes are the ones we race on, very simple!

[Alfonso]

Ok, i guess i need to make some last decisions as president!

I think that we shouldnt have more then 2 GP´s per country. If theres the case of the voting choosing 2 GP´s on same country then one of the GP´s will be renamed as the continent it belongs to, or simply the track name.
Example:
2 Brasil GP´s are voted. One stays as Brasil GP and other one is named South America GP.

Theres another point that i think its important to make clear. I think it should be a role for the president (as he has very few roles),to decide the order of the tracks on the season. But, as i dont want to make a rule looking like it is pointed to me, i want to make clear that next elected president will have that decision.
I can though make a suggestion to my successor. Organize the GP order having in mind the continents.
Example:
Brasil comes first, then Argentina (if voted of course) then USA, then go to Australia, then Japan, Korea, then Europe and then Africa, etc.... you got the point i think.

Ok, i think thats it!

So resume:

• Succeeding president chooses race order calender
• Max 2 Gp´s per country, 2nd GP renamed as continent where it stands or simply track name.

[peter-27]

Ok, i guess i need to make some last decisions as president!

I think that we shouldnt have more then 2 GP´s per country. If theres the case of the voting choosing 2 GP´s on same country then one of the GP´s will be renamed as the continent it belongs to, or simply the track name.
Example:
2 Brasil GP´s are voted. One stays as Brasil GP and other one is named South America GP.

Theres another point that i think its important to make clear. I think it should be a role for the president (as he has very few roles),to decide the order of the tracks on the season. But, as i dont want to make a rule looking like it is pointed to me, i want to make clear that next elected president will have that decision.
I can though make a suggestion to my successor. Organize the GP order having in mind the continents.
Example:
Brasil comes first, then Argentina (if voted of course) then USA, then go to Australia, then Japan, Korea, then Europe and then Africa, etc.... you got the point i think.

Ok, i think thats it!

So resume:

• Succeeding president chooses race order calender
• Max 2 Gp´s per country, 2nd GP renamed as continent where it stands or simply track name.

Good decisions!!

If Paul Ricard makes it in I think we need to either:

a) Put a barrier in that notorius cutting zone.
b) Change the layout of that corner to make the 'non cutting' line less detrimental to race performance.

Thoughts?

Agree with A!!

[berni19]

I am sorry to leave you, but i received some disturbing call and must leave at once...i apologize for that...thanks for your reply...i will be logged here and wait for the start of next season then

[peter-27]

Voting on rules for next season ends about six hours from the time of this post!