Due to a lack of time until the first race we can't spend time debating this, people (or me) need to test :p
We'll use Prz's order, i'll create a proper calendar later in the next 3 hours or so![]()
Due to a lack of time until the first race we can't spend time debating this, people (or me) need to test :p
We'll use Prz's order, i'll create a proper calendar later in the next 3 hours or so![]()
Wait, if Suzuka and Japan both got five votes then both should be included although one under the pacific GP title. We need to drop one from:
4 - GP of Malaysia - Sepang
4 - GP of China - Shanghai
4 - GP of Singapore - Marina Bay
4 - GP of Korea - Yeongam
4 - GP of India - Buddh
4 - GP of Italy - Imola
4 - GP of Europe - Paul Ricard
Either way we need a final calendar by the end of today, even if we have 21 circuits.
Out of those i'd be happy to see Korea go, everyone else post your thoughts![]()
My vote is to say (Nananaheyhey) goodbye to Singapore (High priority) or India (second)![]()
Right so one vote for: China, Korea and Singapore
Malaysia, India, Italy, Europe (Paul Ricard) are the other tracks you can vote on, remember we're looking to drop one here!
We MUST have a calendar by midnight!
When I announced the track voting, I mentioned that there may only be 1 GP per country, with the exception of GP of Europe. So I think all voters were aware, that in a situation like this, some unlucky track may drop out.
Frankly I wasn't aware of the pacific GP (in fact in modern times it only took place twice, in 1994 and 1995) and I did not put it as one of the options. That's why I left it for the new president to decide which track to kick.
Along the 4-voters I'd gladly get rid of Korea or Singapore, not too fond of China either. I think the new president should have a final say about this. Either one of the japanese tracks or one 4-voter has to go.
Even though im in a good position to win elections, i will not say anything about this topic now cause everything can change, so it wouldnt be proper to do it. If votings stays like this i will ASAP post a decision on the matter. But if you want my honest opinion as candidate only, i think instead of having 1 country with 2 GP´s, its better to have 2 countrys represented with one GP each. Its more fair i think.
I think the Pacific GP was kind of "forced". GP of Europe is too, but not as clearly. I think since I only mentioned GP of Europe in my track vote, it would be fair to choose 1 japanese track from the two.
Also, I thought the presidential vote has ended last night, but now I see it's gonna last until the 9th - oops my bad.
In that case, formally the president is still Pete, so he can make a decision on it and if the future president disagrees, we may change the calendar. But honestly I don't think anyone would do that, not too "professional".
My vote would be to drop China or India.
OK I have set online laptimes in Australia and Brazil. The lapcounts are as follows:
AUS: 14 min / 31.100 sec = 27 laps
BRA: 14 min / 44.200 sec = 19 laps
I also found a relation between my best online and offline laptimes: ONLINE = OFFLINE * 1.165
EDIT: OK, I have based my calculation on Afonso's offline laptimes, multiplied by 117% to get online laptimes. Now, Afonso, we need you to set some laptimes on new tracks
![]()
Will complete the calendar by tomorrow afternoon
Thanks Prz!![]()
Out of the old tracks I'd drop India and out of the Japanese ones Suzuka, 'cause we ain't never had Fuji like this before![]()
I'd like to confirm my seat for next season, I will be driving for......Lotus.
I will glady make some laps, even though i think i will not make the best possible lap times as i need quite some laps to take the best out of each track. Unfortunately i dont know if i will have the time to do it till the beginning of the season, but i think it wouldnt be a problem to add the lap amount even after the season has started or? The most important thing is to have at least the 2 first racks, and that we have it already or?![]()
Bookmarks