Page 11 of 59 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 882

Thread: NSGP Online Championship 8

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    2,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sida79 View Post
    Imagine Peter, Kos, Marek and Prz walking through the woods in a NSGPOC8 fan club presidented by Marek.
    One moment Prz says: lets' beat up Peter! ... and Kos looks at him with a strange glow in his eye.
    To that president Marek replies: guys, you might or might not like Peter but we need to do the right thing or else we're worse than animals.
    OR
    President Marek could also appeal to "that crazy thing of yours thats tearing the forum apart" logic and say:
    Let's put it up to vote!

    1

    2

    3

    4
    LOLOLOLOLOL Thanks for making me laugh as soon as i wake up!

    I was thinking where did that guy found those smiles?? And now i saw that they are pictures! It would be nice to have them in this forum,....

    @Kos The big difference between our signatures is that mine is talking about me (even if its implicit the other drivers from the world), and your has my name on it. I feel honored to have such respect from you!
    Last edited by Alfonso; 12-08-2011 at 09:26 AM.


    Hiatus mode activated!!!

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    897

    Default

    I think we could have saved a lot of time and effort if the stewards were named by presidential decree. I think voting for them wasn't wise, but that's my opinion.

    I'm going to try again to see if racing with damage works, so I apologise to whoever's race I ruin on Saturday. Sign me up for Mercedes.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,159

    Default

    Driver list updated!

    Furthermore, after consideration, i have changed the U1 rules.

    "For case 1U, if that recieves more "YES" votes than "NO" votes, it will get accecpted as a rule, thus making all other votes in section one void" is the new method and the only thing which has changed. You still may only have five votes in section one.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Reeves View Post
    I think we could have saved a lot of time and effort if the stewards were named by presidential decree.
    True, but that would hardly be fair would it?

  5. #155
    Othello82's Avatar
    Othello82 is offline First Team Player International Superstar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Porto
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Reeves View Post
    Sign me up for Mercedes.


    As for the contingency plan in case 1.30 isn't out i vote in making both races in the morning with 20 laps each, and if at the end of the season if there is time to remake them in 1.30, those results should prevail. If not the results from this weekend stand.

    Cheers

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    2,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Othello82 View Post


    As for the contingency plan in case 1.30 isn't out i vote in making both races in the morning with 20 laps each, and if at the end of the season if there is time to remake them in 1.30, those results should prevail. If not the results from this weekend stand.

    Cheers
    Yeah, im fine with that but you have to have one thing in mind. Bahrain is a very special track that in 20 laps takes almost the double of time then the others. What it was made on previous seasons where we used to have 2 races in a row, was to make Bahrain as one event.
    Im fine in making both races but maybe its better just one and then wait for 1.30 for next week.

    What the other guys say about it??


    Hiatus mode activated!!!

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,159

    Default

    Personally i think this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Othello82 View Post


    As for the contingency plan in case 1.30 isn't out i vote in making both races in the morning with 20 laps each, and if at the end of the season if there is time to remake them in 1.30, those results should prevail. If not the results from this weekend stand.

    Cheers
    ... is the best idea so far!

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter-27 View Post
    True, but that would hardly be fair would it?
    Actually it would be equally "fair" but faster


    Quote Originally Posted by Othello82 View Post
    As for the contingency plan in case 1.30 isn't out i vote in making both races in the morning with 20 laps each, and if at the end of the season if there is time to remake them in 1.30, those results should prevail. If not the results from this weekend stand.
    For what reason? I mean, it's already voted for races to approx 15 min so we should do 15 laps of Bahrain and 30 of Australia on 1.27 normally
    1.30 is, as far as we're concerned, just a FIA announcement saying: that rule change will take place over the course of season #8 so be prepared.
    Imagine if some had great results on the first weekend and then after replay losing them all? All hell would break loose
    Besides, if FIA says "next race such and such is forbidden" the teams don't usually want a re-run of the championship up to that point

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sida79 View Post
    Actually it would be equally "fair" but faster
    It would be faster for sure but equally fair - i don't think so?

    I mean, this way everyone gets to have their say which seems fairer than just me choosing

    Quote Originally Posted by Sida79 View Post
    For what reason? I mean, it's already voted for races to approx 15 min so we should do 15 laps of Bahrain and 30 of Australia on 1.27 normally
    1.30 is, as far as we're concerned, just a FIA announcement saying: that rule change will take place over the course of season #8 so be prepared.
    Imagine if some had great results on the first weekend and then after replay losing them all? All hell would break loose
    Besides, if FIA says "next race such and such is forbidden" the teams don't usually want a re-run of the championship up to that point
    Actually you have a point there, and objections to this idea?

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    1 lap BHR = 1 minute
    1 lap AUS = 30 sec

    both races 20 laps:
    BHR = 20 mins
    AUS = 10 mins

    BHR 15 laps, AUS 30 laps:
    BHR = 15 mins
    AUS = 15 mins

    Reruning BHR and AUS at the end if there\'s time? What does it mean if there\'s time, there\'s always time . But seriously, if we race BHR and AUS this weekend, these results have to be official and final.
    NSGP Online Championship

  11. #161
    Othello82's Avatar
    Othello82 is offline First Team Player International Superstar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Porto
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by przemator View Post
    Reruning BHR and AUS at the end if there\'s time? What does it mean if there\'s time, there\'s always time . But seriously, if we race BHR and AUS this weekend, these results have to be official and final.
    If there is time then we should wait till 1.30 is out.

    For me it starts this weekend with 1.27 15/30 or 20/20, but if we start with one set of rules designed for the 1.30, in the 1.27 it can create a sense of unfairness if the results aren't what each one expect.

    But i'm ok with either option, just post a final decision Mr. President.

    Cheers

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    2,088

    Default

    I agree with this statement. I wouldnt mind to wait for 1.30 and then start officialy. Still we can race this weekend...we can call it the pre tests. Everyone practices a bit so there´s no Kos type excuses like: "Yeah, i dont make a single lap on NSGP since weeks thats why i was......."
    For me if there´s no Update until Friday evening i would wait one more week for the new version...but as in everything lets hear what the others have to say. Democracy!


    Hiatus mode activated!!!

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter-27 View Post
    It would be faster for sure but equally fair - i don't think so?

    I mean, this way everyone gets to have their say which seems fairer than just me choosing?
    Actually, it's almost exactly the same Neither one of the methods is based on merit so the
    difference can only be in the outcome, not fairness. Actually, perhaps you chosing would be even better
    as the result would be somewhat less expected as when it gets "averaged out".

    This way it's like a lotto drum where some balls are much heavier in the start. Basically a rigged heavily
    discriminating system devoid of any chance for equal opportunity

    It's like playing shortest straw after you've already seen the straws


    Quote Originally Posted by Othello82 View Post
    but if we start with one set of rules designed for the 1.30, in the 1.27 it can create a sense of unfairness if the results aren't what each one expect.
    Can you give an example of this? I don't think any of 1.30 rules can be applied to 1.27 so it's a clear transition for everyone. We could wait too, IF we knew when to expect 1.30, otherwise we might wait forever


    Quote Originally Posted by Alfonso View Post
    I agree with this statement. I wouldnt mind to wait for 1.30 and then start officialy. Still we can race this weekend...we can call it the pre tests. Everyone practices a bit so there´s no Kos type excuses like: "Yeah, i dont make a single lap on NSGP since weeks thats why i was......."
    Why would I make such an excuse? I will just claim how I was the fastest man in my signature and when presented with evidence that says otherwise I will simply say "that's your opinion but I don't agree"

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Let's also note that because we can't get replays, we also can't do any of the Race Control until 1.30 is out. So when my laggy ass ruins your race and when I'm wrecked because you saw me as 2-3 seconds away as you were beating the living daylights out of me on my screen, there's nothing that can be done about it.

    I'd prefer to wait, but my vote on these things is insignificant.

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Your laggy ass is welcome to ruin my race Alex... it's just a game

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •