View Full Version : Who is the best Australian player???
Who is the best Australian player???
Who do you think
from this list i could vote only for 3 players: kewell, viduka and schwarzer but i chose kewell
from this list i could vote only for 3 players: kewell, viduka and schwarzer but i chose kewell
What about Cahill???
Hard to say not having seen Bresciano in action, but it looks like he's got a pretty good record during his time in Italy.
I'd probably say Cahill is the best performing at present, but Kewell has (had?) the potential to be a world class player.
diggisaur
08-05-2005, 04:09 PM
Australia has good players?
Runs and hides....
No I kid... i remember seeing some of those old Oceania world cup preliminaries when Asutralia was beating folks 31-0 or 26-0. Scary.
But then when you are playing against some tiny island that barely have enough people to fill a team...... :)
Australia has good players?
Runs and hides....
No I kid... i remember seeing some of those old Oceania world cup preliminaries when Asutralia was beating folks 31-0 or 26-0. Scary.
But then when you are playing against some tiny island that barely have enough people to fill a team...... :)
Yeah Archie Tompson holds the record for most goals in a game. He scored 13 or 16 or somthing like that in a huge win against Samoa.
Allan
08-06-2005, 05:21 AM
i will have to vote forkewell as his the best from the although viduka and cahil are good also. :D
diggisaur
08-06-2005, 02:22 PM
Yea but does Somoa even have enough people to fill a team LOL......
I mean you stick England against Somoa, I wonder what the score would be. :)
manyoolova
08-06-2005, 04:14 PM
Yea but does Somoa even have enough people to fill a team LOL......
I mean you stick England against Somoa, I wonder what the score would be. :)
*Inhales loudly and puffs out cheeks*
"Oooh, well, I'd have to say 120-0, possibly even 150-0"
Dimitrije
08-06-2005, 04:29 PM
kewel is really good but viduka isn't bad
Yea but does Somoa even have enough people to fill a team LOL......
I mean you stick England against Somoa, I wonder what the score would be. :)
*Inhales loudly and puffs out cheeks*
"Oooh, well, I'd have to say 120-0, possibly even 150-0"
Samoa are much improved now last time australia played them it was 6 - 0 for australia. Since australia beet england 3 -1 the result between england and samoa would be 2-0 or 3-0.
you think that what you have write about england and samoa can be in real world?? i don't think so.
if australia is as good as you write why they don't play in world cup in last years??
Wednesdaylad43
08-07-2005, 03:25 PM
Soha is right, the proof is in the pudding, and you have missed out on the world cup pudding for a number of years. Its not like Australia have the toughest ever qualifying group, and you always seem to end up playing Saudi Arabia or Kuwait in a play off to get near to the world cup.
And you dont follow the cricket by any chance do you mate? :lol:
manyoolova
08-07-2005, 04:13 PM
Or rugby?
diggisaur
08-07-2005, 04:18 PM
Yea but does Somoa even have enough people to fill a team LOL......
I mean you stick England against Somoa, I wonder what the score would be. :)
*Inhales loudly and puffs out cheeks*
"Oooh, well, I'd have to say 120-0, possibly even 150-0"
Samoa are much improved now last time australia played them it was 6 - 0 for australia. Since australia beet england 3 -1 the result between england and samoa would be 2-0 or 3-0.
I think that is a terrible comparision. And yes, Somoa have improved. Weren't those 26-0 losses a result against Australia there first year in the world cup? No wonder Australia spanked them so much. Any team would have. You also notice that in the same breath New Zealand was killing them that year as well. Maybe not as much as Australia but they were still killing them.
Wednesdaylad43
08-07-2005, 05:26 PM
Or rugby?
No, were crap at rugby. I do like cricket thats all, always good to talk to someone if they are informed about the game, and if they have a different perspective on it to me due to living on the other side of the world is an added bonus.
But shhh bout the rugger yeah?? :o
manyoolova
08-07-2005, 07:28 PM
Or rugby?
No, were rubbish at rugby. I do like cricket thats all, always good to talk to someone if they are informed about the game, and if they have a different perspective on it to me due to living on the other side of the world is an added bonus.
But shhh bout the rugger yeah?? :o
Pardon?
manyoolova
08-07-2005, 07:36 PM
Soha is right, the proof is in the pudding, and you have missed out on the world cup pudding for a number of years. Its not like Australia have the toughest ever qualifying group, and you always seem to end up playing Saudi Arabia or Kuwait in a play off to get near to the world cup.
And you dont follow the cricket by any chance do you mate? :lol:
Good cricket forum is..... http://forum.cricket.co.uk/
FCKBO
08-07-2005, 08:16 PM
Mark Bosnich, because he uses drugs!! :twisted:
he uses drugs but he wasn't good player. i don't know what he was doing in man utd?
he uses drugs but he wasn't good player. i don't know what he was doing in man utd?Bosnich was a quality keeper, Man U wanted to sign him when he was still in his teens i think. I think he just lost his way. :(
Wednesdaylad43
08-07-2005, 11:19 PM
Ive read several sources saying that when they saw Bosnich in his late teens and early 20's, before he went to villa, he was one of the best young keepers they had ever seen. Ron Atkinson described his as the best keeper he had ever seen for a player of his age when he brought him to Villa.
I wont listen to anyone saying he is a poor keeper, he did indeed, just lose his way
you think that what you have write about england and samoa can be in real world?? i don't think so.
if australia is as good as you write why they don't play in world cup in last years??
Because FIFA never give them a chance. 1994 they had to play Argentina. 1996 they played Iran, a winnable game, in the second leg australia was thrashing them but a pitch invader stopped the game for 15 minutes and after that australia conceeded 2 goals to lose by the away goals rule. 2002 they played Uruguay, they were better then they are now, and they losed because in Uruguay they were spit on and harased because they won the first leg.
Soha is right, the proof is in the pudding, and you have missed out on the world cup pudding for a number of years. Its not like Australia have the toughest ever qualifying group, and you always seem to end up playing Saudi Arabia or Kuwait in a play off to get near to the world cup.
And you dont follow the cricket by any chance do you mate? :lol:
Australia have not played those 2. Now Australia are in AFC they will qualify for world cups. 2006 world cup they will play a South American team again for the chance to qualify, most likely Columbia.
but uruguay was better and they have played in world cup ( i think that australia were that time team on uruguay level).
now they can play in world cup because they will play in asian qualifications. but remember that one of the best teams in asia have lose with germany 0:8 on world cup. so think about asian football level.
in real they have only one AVERAGE team- japan.
they have a very good team!!! If you knew about world soccer you would know this.
manyoolova
08-08-2005, 05:42 PM
but uruguay was better and they have played in world cup ( i think that australia were that time team on uruguay level).
now they can play in world cup because they will play in asian qualifications. but remember that one of the best teams in asia have lose with germany 0:8 on world cup. so think about asian football level.
in real they have only one AVERAGE team- japan.
Don't forget South Korea!
manyoolova
08-08-2005, 06:26 PM
they have a very good team!!! If you knew about world soccer you would know this.
Look, the point is that if Australiea had a half-way decent team then they would have been in Japan/South Korea.
they have a very good team!!! If you knew about world soccer you would know this.
Look, the point is that if Australiea had a half-way decent team then they would have been in Japan/South Korea.
they did have a halfway decent team. If you got spit on and you recieved death threats i would like to see how well you play. Australia proved they could beat them by winning the first leg but then they were harased and they recieved death threats when they went to Uruguay.
they have won first leg but in playoffs were two matches and they lose
i belive i mentioned why they lossed that second leg.
manyoolova
08-09-2005, 05:44 PM
A good player should be able to play in troubled conditions and simply put it down to small-mindedness.
Well if you recieved death threats you wouldnt play well would you? You would not play at all probably. FIFA should have had the second leg played at a neutrale venue.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.